There is a fundamental and ...
Published by Douglas Cross, Mr.
There is a fundamental and critical error in the concept of 'Linking India's Rivers'. Whilst issues of hydrology, hydraulics, ecology, and social interests are themselves highly complex and in this case grossly under-investigated, the prime fallacy inherent in this concept is expressed by that simple word in the title of the project – 'India's'.
The Indus and Brahmaputra are NOT India's rivers! They are natural resources that are shared with other nations. Regarding the drainage flows from the Himalayan massif into the Indus as Indian property, to be allocated and diverted wherever might be most useful (for India) ignores the legal entitlement of the people of Pakistan to much of that water.
Equally, flows down the Brahmaputra are NOT all available to India, merely because this great river flows through a few Km of Indian territory. The people of Bangladesh downstream are also almost entirely dependent on this source for their own survival.
Such introspective planning is unfortunately not new in the region. The diversion of the Ganga into the Hoogly at Farakka, to preserve the hydraulics of that river and Kolkata Port, deprived south-western Bangladesh and part of the Sundarbanns of essential water and had devastating effects on the lower Ganga in Bangladesh. Remarkably, the EIA for the Farakka Barrage – at least the version disclosed to me - inexplicably failed to consider any downstream impacts whatever.
The dilemma faced by India is quite simple here. If, as it appears to be assumed, India is entitled to abstract as much water as it decides that it needs from the Brahmaputra, regardless of the entitlement of Bangladesh, then precisely the same reasoning supports the view that China has just as much right to abstract water from the Brahmaputra before it reaches Indian territory.
The issue of inter-basin transfers is complex when carried out entirely within the boundaries of sovereign states. When it broadens to multi-state territories, especially where geopolitical interests are in conflict, then the spectre of the long-predicted water wars emerges as an inevitable consequence.
My qualifications for making this statement? Top-level scientific responsibility for environmental analysis in the Indus Basin Drainage Plan and the Bangladesh Flood Action Plan, and research on the impacts of the diversion of the Ganga at Farakka and of the Sardar Sarovar Dam, among many other similar projects.
3 Comments
Is it not a fact that Punjab wastes so much of water and can sell the spare some of it for Rajasthan and Haryana ,Punjab can also allow safe passage of water from J&K/ H.P. to Haryana-Rajasthan-Delhi.
Published by LOKESH PUNJ, A B.TECH. Agr Engg, PGDM-SPA IIMA (1977-9) 25 yrs in Water Piping / Irrigation/Infra Projects
With all the so much given as known, I still think that we should explore selective and by design (a) linking of increased capacity reservoirs and new reservoirs with River systems (b) Interlinking some tributary rivers with main river via reservoirs.. basically diversion of partial flows and with time lags and (c) Interlinking River systems via u/g aquifers recharges and (d) Diversion of fractional flows from one river to another river system
Published by LOKESH PUNJ, A B.TECH. Agr Engg, PGDM-SPA IIMA (1977-9) 25 yrs in Water Piping / Irrigation/Infra Projects
IS IT NOT A FACT THAT WE HAVE NOT TAPPED EVEN WHAT LEGALLY IS AVAILABLE TO US FOR SIMPLE REASON THAT WE HAVE NEVER THOUGHT OF EITHER AUGMENTING OUR SURFACE RESERVOIRS NOR RECHARGING OF U/G AQUIFERS AND DIVERSION OF SURFACE WATER INCLUDING RIVERS TO AUGMENT EACH OTHER'S FLOWS.
POPULATION HAS GROEN MANY FOLD ANF FLOOD PLAINS OF RIVERS HAVE BEEN DIMINISHING AND TAPPING SURFACE RUN OFFS IS WHAT IS BUGGING ENVIRONMENTAKISTS ? MUCH CAN BE DONE IF TECHNICAL MINDS ARE OPEN.
Published by LOKESH PUNJ, A B.TECH. Agr Engg, PGDM-SPA IIMA (1977-9) 25 yrs in Water Piping / Irrigation/Infra Projects